Menu
Every case is different. The verdicts and settlements results below reflect the specific facts, evidence, and circumstances of each matter, and they do not predict or guarantee the outcome of any future case.
A business owner was sued in two separate lawsuits seeking $1.4 million in damages, plus treble damages and punitive damages under California's civil theft statute (Penal Code § 496) and more than $500,000 in attorney's fees — potential exposure in the millions, alongside allegations of fraud. James negotiated a resolution in which both cases were fully and finally satisfied for a total of two dollars. When allegations carry personal, financial and reputational stakes, the goal is not just to win — it's to end the case in a way that lets you move forward with your future, your reputation, and your life intact.
A client was served with a request for a domestic violence restraining order by his ex-wife, who simultaneously refused to vacate his home as required by their marital settlement agreement, claimed a $20,000 payment had never been made, and sought to change the child custody order based on her abuse allegations. After a contested hearing, the court denied the restraining order request entirely. The court also ordered her to vacate the client's home, found that the client had actually overpaid by $5,000 — entering a money judgment in his favor — and the custody order remained unchanged. Four fronts. Four wins.
A client faced a request for a domestic violence restraining order in San Francisco Superior Court alleging physical and emotional abuse. James filed a comprehensive written response dismantling the allegations. The petition was withdrawn and the case dismissed — without the client ever having to testify. Sometimes the strongest courtroom victory is the one that ends before the courtroom.
Before founding Owens Defense, James served as a Deputy District Attorney in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. That experience is why he knows how the government builds its cases — and where they come apart. As a prosecutor, James:
He now uses that insider knowledge exclusively for the defense.
Past verdicts and settlements results do not guarantee, warrant, or predict future outcomes. Every case depends on its unique facts and circumstances.